Logical Fallacies - Ad Hominem

Jul 5
2 min read

A series that reflects the heart and purpose of Rubicon Free Press.

Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that make an argument unsound, even if it may sound convincing. They often involve flawed logic or irrelevant information used to persuade, rather than valid evidence. Understanding these fallacies is crucial for critical thinking and evaluating arguments effectively.

Ad Hominem: This fallacy attacks the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself.

Example: "You can't believe her opinion on climate change, she's just a teenager."

An ad hominem logical fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing the substance of an argument, one attacks the person making the argument. This fallacy attempts to discredit an idea by discrediting the person who proposed it, often by attacking their character, circumstances, or other irrelevant attributes.

Key aspects of the ad hominem fallacy

Shifting Focus

It distracts from the actual issue by focusing on irrelevant personal characteristics.

Lack of Evidence

It doesn't address the merits of the argument itself, relying instead on personal attacks.

Common Types

Abusive ad hominem:

Directly attacks the person's character, like saying they are unintelligent or dishonest.

Circumstantial ad hominem:

Attacks the person based on their circumstances, like their job or political affiliation, suggesting their position is biased.

Tu quoque:

Attempts to discredit an argument by pointing out the arguer's hypocrisy.

Examples:

"You can't believe their claims about climate change; they're just a bunch of tree-hugging hippies," is an abusive ad hominem.

"Don't listen to their economic policy recommendations; they're just a wealthy CEO trying to protect their own interests," is a circumstantial ad hominem.

"You say smoking is bad for you, but you smoke yourself," is a tu quoque example.

Why it's a fallacy:

The validity of an argument doesn't depend on the character or circumstances of the person making it. An argument can be sound regardless of who presents it.

In essence, an ad hominem fallacy is a way to avoid engaging with an argument by attacking the person, rather than addressing the issue itself.

-----

NOTE: This summary is, in large part, provided by Google. As the series continues, each summary will be expanded upon and embodied in the mission and vision of Rubicon Free Press.

Some source material is from